Feature request for softether protocol

Discussion about VPN Client Pro
Elezorn
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Feature request for softether protocol

Post by Elezorn »

admin wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 4:45 pm Thanks for your help.
I have released the beta version 1.01.98 which should fix these issues.
Can you please try it and give me feedback?
First testing confirmed that UDP Acceleration works when connecting to a CG-NATed server via AzureRelay.
50mbit link, 2kkm away from server - https://prnt.sc/nbnJ2zawe09-

While testing on a couple of different servers I found another issue, but with UDP NAT-T type of connection. When connecting to server via *.softether.net domain the download speed is abnormally low and "UDP Supported NO" is displayed on Server side. But connection to same server via azure lacks this problem :D
This issue is reproducible on previous stable version of the app too.
Client: AzureRelay vs NAT-T - https://prnt.sc/Pr9vqcGHQtUB
Server: VPNClient Pro vs Native Client - https://prnt.sc/Eu0rstoP4BHb
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 741
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature request for softether protocol

Post by admin »

Thanks for the feedback.
Can I use your server for NAT-T testing too?
Elezorn
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Feature request for softether protocol

Post by Elezorn »

admin wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:57 pm Thanks for the feedback.
Can I use your server for NAT-T testing too?
You can try, but I don't think it will be reachable via NAT-T@*.softether.net
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 741
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature request for softether protocol

Post by admin »

Thanks for letting me use your server for testing, but unfortunately it is not useful for NAT-T connection.
Unfortunately the NAT-T connection speed problem is not easy to find and fix.
At the moment I do not know how long it will take, so I will promote the beta version to production and then take my time for the other problem...
Elezorn
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Feature request for softether protocol

Post by Elezorn »

admin wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:09 am Thanks for letting me use your server for testing, but unfortunately it is not useful for NAT-T connection.
Unfortunately the NAT-T connection speed problem is not easy to find and fix.
At the moment I do not know how long it will take, so I will promote the beta version to production and then take my time for the other problem...
Hi, PMed you another credentials
Post Reply