Feature request for softether protocol

[Elezorn]

Thanks for your help.
I have released the beta version 1.01.98 which should fix these issues.
Can you please try it and give me feedback?

First testing confirmed that UDP Acceleration works when connecting to a CG-NATed server via AzureRelay.
50mbit link, 2kkm away from server - https://prnt.sc/nbnJ2zawe09-

While testing on a couple of different servers I found another issue, but with UDP NAT-T type of connection. When connecting to server via *.softether.net domain the download speed is abnormally low and "UDP Supported NO" is displayed on Server side. But connection to same server via azure lacks this problem
This issue is reproducible on previous stable version of the app too.
Client: AzureRelay vs NAT-T - https://prnt.sc/Pr9vqcGHQtUB
Server: VPNClient Pro vs Native Client - https://prnt.sc/Eu0rstoP4BHb

[admin]

Thanks for the feedback.
Can I use your server for NAT-T testing too?

[Elezorn]

Thanks for the feedback.
Can I use your server for NAT-T testing too?

You can try, but I don't think it will be reachable via NAT-T@*.softether.net

[admin]

Thanks for letting me use your server for testing, but unfortunately it is not useful for NAT-T connection.
Unfortunately the NAT-T connection speed problem is not easy to find and fix.
At the moment I do not know how long it will take, so I will promote the beta version to production and then take my time for the other problem...

[Elezorn]

Thanks for letting me use your server for testing, but unfortunately it is not useful for NAT-T connection.
Unfortunately the NAT-T connection speed problem is not easy to find and fix.
At the moment I do not know how long it will take, so I will promote the beta version to production and then take my time for the other problem...

Hi, PMed you another credentials

[admin]

Sorry for the wait, I think I've solved the NAT-T connection speed issue.
Can you please try the beta version 1.01.99 and give me feedback?

[Elezorn]

I've tried couple of servers, issue seems to be solved by now, yes

[admin]

Great!
Thanks a lot for your help